Gory video games claim freedom of expression protection

March 18, 2008

The Boston mayor moves to ban the sale of gory video games to teenagers, while the games’ advocates claim protection under First Amendment, Boston Herald reports.

The cities of Boston and neighboring Brockton face high rates of teenage street violence edging up to an increased number of murders. Despite unfavorable precedents, the authorities aim to halt the sale of violet games to teens, which, they claim, might be adding to the overall street crime.

Teen video gamers and industry react angrily against a possible ruling. They say it is up to parents to decide whether teens should play Grand Theft Auto, for example, and not up to authorities.

In a precedent judgment, Judge James Brady, of Louisiana, said video games are “as much entitled to the protection of free speech as the best of literature.”

Picture: Flickr

iPhone users to suffer consequences of Apple’s discontent with Flash

March 5, 2008

Apple seems to leave out Adobe’s Flash application at its upcoming iPhone software presentation, writes Dan Frommer in a Silicon Alley Insider story. He brings about a report by Dow Jones which quotes Steve Jobs saying that “Adobe hasn’t created a version of Flash that’s suitable for the iPhone.”

Dropping a flash application in iPhone software suit would mean that “iPhone users [will] have to settle for a less-complete version of the Web,” Frommer writes, unless Apple finds a substitute.

Yet, some users see the time for mobile Flash “battery-sucking ad banners” far-fetched. “It is in Apple’s DNA to only go with good technology,” a reader comments, referring to an alternative to Adobe’s Flash, Microsoft’s Silverlight, “not to compromise user’s experience. Having said that, I’m in no hurry for Flash, either. CPU (and battery)-sucking banner ads? No thanks,” the comment reads.

Picture: Flickr

Google revives wiki web publishing - more user-friendly and less customizable

March 4, 2008

Google continues to expand its Apps, adding a team web publishing tool to the bulk. Google had acquired JotSpot wiki service back in October 2006, and now, after 16 months, launched it as a new Google App, naming it Google Sites.

Michael Arrington writes on techcrunch.com “Google Sites looks absolutely nothing like Jotspot, other than the fact that both are hosted wikis. All of the structured data templates launched by Jotspot in July 2006 have been stripped out.”

The new Google App added user-friendliness but took away from functionality, lacking an application program interface (API), and having limited backward scalability, writes Juan Carlos Peres on arnnet.com.au, summarizing the mixed feelings incumbent Jotspot users have voiced.

Picture: Flickr

Flow-based search architecture promises flawless

February 24, 2008

Bill Burnham, an early beta-tester of a, what he calls, flow-based search engine, predicts bright future for SkyGrid and even its ability to predict it; the future, that is.

Mr. Burnham writes on alwayson.goingon.com that when the flow, filter, analyze search architecture correlates to the “observed movements in things like … stock markets, company sales […] it should ultimately be able to theoretically predict, with reasonable accuracy, many of those changes. Yes, I said it: SkyGrid and its new search architecture may ultimately predict the future,” the author writes.

Mr. Burnham contrasts the “flow/filter/analyze” SkyGrid architecture to the “traditional” “crawl, index, query,” and the verdict to the latter sounds pessimistic. He calls SkyGrid “a radical new architecture” which ‘holds the potential to actually predict the pattern and influence of idea/meme propagation throughout the internet and from there into the financial markets and beyond.” To support his claims, the author breaks the flow-based architecture description in a series of logical steps that he had, as an early beta-tester, identified.

As to the danger of having the new, “revolutionary” search architecture getting beaten by the sharks of the business, Google, for instance, Mr. Burnham has the answer to that. “Moving from a traditional crawl/index/query architecture to a flow/filter/analyze one is a decidedly non-trivial undertaking, one that would require an entire re-architecture of their core services and thus one highly unlikely to be made.”

Picture: Flickr

Replacing paper in direct mail by stuff

February 20, 2008

Getting a weird hookadoo in your mailbox may not be such a remote thing, if Matter project works well, Community Mobilization blog implies.

“Matter is taking an unconventional approach to direct marketing by sending out boxes of ‘interesting stuff’ instead of paper,” following the historically successful model of Direct Mail.

“[The project] is a collaboration between Artomatic and Royal Mail, and it targets consumers in the UK only. If US based companies and philanthropies adopt this method who knows what kind of interesting stuff we may get in the mail, or how much junk we will be contributing to our landfills.”

Picture: Flickr

BusinessWeek might grab digital activism by the throat

February 20, 2008

Mary wonders on zapcoom.com about what implication for digital activists can have a story published in the “conservative BusinessWeek” magazine. “We go beyond signing up on an online petition,” says Mark Hanis, executive director of the Genocide Intervention Network, quoted by BusinessWeek. “The Web is very much the gateway into taking substantive action,” he says referring to a Facebook group initiative to help Darfur.

“What does it mean when a conservative magazine like BusinessWeek writes a story about college kids using Facebook to organize against the carnage in Darfur?” Mary writes. “It means that they see the practice of digital activism (or ‘activism 2.0,’ as they call it) to be widespread and influential enough to be worthy of notice.”

Careful to take into account BusinessWeek’s profit-seeking intentions, Mary comments that the site sees “some commercial implications from this new user group.”

“If activism is another motivation for using an ad-driven online service like Facebook or YouTube, the owners of these services are right to pay attention to their demands. I would love it if the market tailored services to meet the needs of digital activists.”

Picture: Flickr

Online learning may be flat but also deep, if demand is high

February 20, 2008

Increasing demand for higher education is becoming difficult for traditional campuses to meet. Fortunately, there is Internet and Web 2.0, which will eventually lead to Learning 2.0, write John Seely Brown and Richard P. Adler in their paper “Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0.”

“The latest evolution of the Internet, the so-called Web 2.0,” the paper reads “has blurred the line between producers and consumers of content and has shifted attention from access to information toward access to other people.”

Web 2.0 facilitates the social learning, peer to peer, and scientist to scientist as well as combinations of these. “Understanding is socially constructive,” the authors write. At the same time, online education has a “long tail.” “Whereas traditional schools offer a finite number of courses of study, the “catalog” of subjects that can be learned online is almost unlimited.”

In their lengthy paper the authors present thoroughly how the demand-driven education involves more passion and, thus, better quality knowledge. “This new form of learning begins with the knowledge and practices acquired in school but is equally suited for continuous, lifelong learning that extends beyond formal schooling.”

Picture: Connect.educause.edu

TV ads might lose the cash cow status in a move to online

February 20, 2008

Webisodes and advertorials seem to be winning ground from traditional channels of advertising distribution – TV, VOD, and set-top box menu. Or so shows the study released by The Association of National Advertisers and Forrester Research, comments Jackson West on Newteevee.com.

“For producers looking for sponsors,” Mr. West writes “87 percent of advertisers believe branded entertainment — from sponsor shout-outs to product placement — will play a stronger role.”

The poll also shows a decrease in budgets for TV ads. “[T]he stat that really jumped out at me claims that over half of the marketers polled said that they’d cut television advertising budgets by 12 percent once DVR penetration had reached half of American homes.

“Where’s that money going to go?” the author wonders.

Picture: Flickr

Futurist looks at computerized policy-making, to tackle engineering challenges

February 20, 2008

Daniel W. Rasmus discusses on his futuristic blog some of the Grand engineering challenges identified by a select committee from the National Engineering Academy (NEA).

Mr. Rasmus stressed the necessity of grassroots model of policy making in order to tackle the listed challenges. “I think we need a more distributed, organic method that integrates public policy makers, citizens and the organizations that co-exist in a given area.” He points out the possibilities of technology in policy making. “[S]cience can help depoliticize the planning process and providing transparency into how various constraints: natural, technological and political, were handled in the various models.”

The 14 challenges identified by the NEA are: “Make solar energy economical; Provide energy from fusion; Develop carbon sequestration methods; Manage the nitrogen cycle; Provide access to clean water; Restore and improve urban infrastructure; Advance health informatics; Engineer better medicines; Reverse-engineer the brain; Prevent nuclear terror; Secure cyberspace; Enhance virtual reality; Advance personalized learning; Engineer the tools of scientific discovery.”

Picture: NEA

Zoom in next door even on vacation, using Google maps

February 20, 2008

Google’s expansion of its successful Maps program to searchable street views brought about Fred Stutzman’s reaction on his Unit Structures blog, where he outlines the main pros and cons of the new development.

“First and foremost, the streetview maps are really interesting,” Mr. Stutzman writes. “The technology and integration is very cool, and the maps are useful. […] Please don’t accuse me of not appreciating the maps.”

The author articulates several issues, tackling particularly the issues of privacy and its technology-driven expanding nature. Mr. Stutzman relates to the “living publicly” concept. In the context, he points out the short-hand that the new Google Maps feature provides for even a “non-stalker type” to see one’s place of living.

“With streetview, Google has gained significant agency in your offline identity,” the author writes. “Your house is now searchable by anyone; others may peer into your windows, zoom in and out, and explore your house from multiple perspectives. Is this simply another tradeoff we’ll make so we can gawk at the houses of others? And to put it more bluntly, has Google gone mad with power?”

Picture: Unit Structures

Next Page »