Gory video games claim freedom of expression protection
March 18, 2008
The Boston mayor moves to ban the sale of gory video games to teenagers, while the games’ advocates claim protection under First Amendment, Boston Herald reports.
The cities of Boston and neighboring Brockton face high rates of teenage street violence edging up to an increased number of murders. Despite unfavorable precedents, the authorities aim to halt the sale of violet games to teens, which, they claim, might be adding to the overall street crime.
Teen video gamers and industry react angrily against a possible ruling. They say it is up to parents to decide whether teens should play Grand Theft Auto, for example, and not up to authorities.
In a precedent judgment, Judge James Brady, of Louisiana, said video games are “as much entitled to the protection of free speech as the best of literature.”
Picture: Flickr
iPhone users to suffer consequences of Apple’s discontent with Flash
March 5, 2008
Apple seems to leave out Adobe’s Flash application at its upcoming iPhone software presentation, writes Dan Frommer in a Silicon Alley Insider story. He brings about a report by Dow Jones which quotes Steve Jobs saying that “Adobe hasn’t created a version of Flash that’s suitable for the iPhone.”
Dropping a flash application in iPhone software suit would mean that “iPhone users [will] have to settle for a less-complete version of the Web,” Frommer writes, unless Apple finds a substitute.
Yet, some users see the time for mobile Flash “battery-sucking ad banners” far-fetched. “It is in Apple’s DNA to only go with good technology,” a reader comments, referring to an alternative to Adobe’s Flash, Microsoft’s Silverlight, “not to compromise user’s experience. Having said that, I’m in no hurry for Flash, either. CPU (and battery)-sucking banner ads? No thanks,” the comment reads.
Picture: Flickr
Google revives wiki web publishing - more user-friendly and less customizable
March 4, 2008
Google continues to expand its Apps, adding a team web publishing tool to the bulk. Google had acquired JotSpot wiki service back in October 2006, and now, after 16 months, launched it as a new Google App, naming it Google Sites.
Michael Arrington writes on techcrunch.com “Google Sites looks absolutely nothing like Jotspot, other than the fact that both are hosted wikis. All of the structured data templates launched by Jotspot in July 2006 have been stripped out.”
The new Google App added user-friendliness but took away from functionality, lacking an application program interface (API), and having limited backward scalability, writes Juan Carlos Peres on arnnet.com.au, summarizing the mixed feelings incumbent Jotspot users have voiced.
Picture: Flickr
Flow-based search architecture promises flawless
February 24, 2008
Bill Burnham, an early beta-tester of a, what he calls, flow-based search engine, predicts bright future for SkyGrid and even its ability to predict it; the future, that is.
Mr. Burnham writes on alwayson.goingon.com that when the flow, filter, analyze search architecture correlates to the “observed movements in things like … stock markets, company sales […] it should ultimately be able to theoretically predict, with reasonable accuracy, many of those changes. Yes, I said it: SkyGrid and its new search architecture may ultimately predict the future,” the author writes.
Mr. Burnham contrasts the “flow/filter/analyze” SkyGrid architecture to the “traditional” “crawl, index, query,” and the verdict to the latter sounds pessimistic. He calls SkyGrid “a radical new architecture” which ‘holds the potential to actually predict the pattern and influence of idea/meme propagation throughout the internet and from there into the financial markets and beyond.” To support his claims, the author breaks the flow-based architecture description in a series of logical steps that he had, as an early beta-tester, identified.
As to the danger of having the new, “revolutionary” search architecture getting beaten by the sharks of the business, Google, for instance, Mr. Burnham has the answer to that. “Moving from a traditional crawl/index/query architecture to a flow/filter/analyze one is a decidedly non-trivial undertaking, one that would require an entire re-architecture of their core services and thus one highly unlikely to be made.”
Picture: Flickr
Full-fetched mobile networking might stand out as commodity
February 20, 2008
Christian Kreutz comes up with the natural question, “When is the collaborative mobile web coming?” on his crisscrossed.net blog.
“It is clear that the mobile will sooner or later bypass the personal computer by Internet usage,” he writes. But, “will it work? By this I mean that I can interact with all sorts of tools via my mobile phone — edit a wiki, build a mashup, writing a blog post, and finally network more effectively.”
Of course, Mr. Kreutz also sees other shortcomings of the mobile networking. “There are still many limitation to the phone: the screen, keyboard, connection. However this is just a matter of time, and recent devices already make a difference. I wonder why so little has been developed in order to interact and collaborate via the mobile phone in the social web.”
Place all the eggs in one basket: SDSN
February 20, 2008
It appears that the abundance of social networks gives headaches to busy guys. Several IT blokes from South Africa came up with a unified account, Simple Distributed Social Network (SDSN). “Their concept is simple,” whiteafrican.com reports, “create a standardized way for people to own their own profiles, so they’re not tied into (and recreated) on every social website (like Facebook, Flickr, YouTube, Twitter, MySpace, etc…).”
The rationale behind the services is also simple. “If you think about it, the way we’re handling profiles online is a little crazy. Having my profile duplicated multiple locations, for each site, is neither efficient or a good long-term solution,” Whiteafrican reads.
Although the idea is not new, it has some important innovative features, the website writes. “To be honest, a couple other services are trying to tackle some of these same issues (OpenID, Microformats, Google’s OpenSocial, etc…). SDSN compliments these services, from what I can tell, and simplifies it for anyone who has their own website.”
Picture: whiteafrican.com
Social annotation comes handy in online research
February 20, 2008
The “proverbial” quest for “needle in the haystack” finds application in social bookmarking, Rebecca seems to imply on wildapricot.com.
Without leaving out the benefits of social bookmarking, Rebecca wonders whether “the usual social bookmarking services really are the best possible tool for organizing that flood of online information, [when it] comes to online research and collaboration?”
“Diigo.com takes social bookmarking to a new level of usefulness,” Rebecca writes. “It’s all about social annotation. Highlight text or leave a note, right on the web page itself.”
Picture: Flickr
Online learning may be flat but also deep, if demand is high
February 20, 2008
Increasing demand for higher education is becoming difficult for traditional campuses to meet. Fortunately, there is Internet and Web 2.0, which will eventually lead to Learning 2.0, write John Seely Brown and Richard P. Adler in their paper “Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0.”
“The latest evolution of the Internet, the so-called Web 2.0,” the paper reads “has blurred the line between producers and consumers of content and has shifted attention from access to information toward access to other people.”
Web 2.0 facilitates the social learning, peer to peer, and scientist to scientist as well as combinations of these. “Understanding is socially constructive,” the authors write. At the same time, online education has a “long tail.” “Whereas traditional schools offer a finite number of courses of study, the “catalog” of subjects that can be learned online is almost unlimited.”
In their lengthy paper the authors present thoroughly how the demand-driven education involves more passion and, thus, better quality knowledge. “This new form of learning begins with the knowledge and practices acquired in school but is equally suited for continuous, lifelong learning that extends beyond formal schooling.”
Picture: Connect.educause.edu
TV ads might lose the cash cow status in a move to online
February 20, 2008
Webisodes and advertorials seem to be winning ground from traditional channels of advertising distribution – TV, VOD, and set-top box menu. Or so shows the study released by The Association of National Advertisers and Forrester Research, comments Jackson West on Newteevee.com.
“For producers looking for sponsors,” Mr. West writes “87 percent of advertisers believe branded entertainment — from sponsor shout-outs to product placement — will play a stronger role.”
The poll also shows a decrease in budgets for TV ads. “[T]he stat that really jumped out at me claims that over half of the marketers polled said that they’d cut television advertising budgets by 12 percent once DVR penetration had reached half of American homes.
“Where’s that money going to go?” the author wonders.
Picture: Flickr
Futurist looks at computerized policy-making, to tackle engineering challenges
February 20, 2008
Daniel W. Rasmus discusses on his futuristic blog some of the Grand engineering challenges identified by a select committee from the National Engineering Academy (NEA).
Mr. Rasmus stressed the necessity of grassroots model of policy making in order to tackle the listed challenges. “I think we need a more distributed, organic method that integrates public policy makers, citizens and the organizations that co-exist in a given area.” He points out the possibilities of technology in policy making. “[S]cience can help depoliticize the planning process and providing transparency into how various constraints: natural, technological and political, were handled in the various models.”
The 14 challenges identified by the NEA are: “Make solar energy economical; Provide energy from fusion; Develop carbon sequestration methods; Manage the nitrogen cycle; Provide access to clean water; Restore and improve urban infrastructure; Advance health informatics; Engineer better medicines; Reverse-engineer the brain; Prevent nuclear terror; Secure cyberspace; Enhance virtual reality; Advance personalized learning; Engineer the tools of scientific discovery.”
Picture: NEA